User talk:Record307 - Revision history

Record307: /* Bottom 10 */ siggy

2010-04-02T02:44:38Z

Bottom 10: siggy

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 2 April 2010
Line 74:		Line 74:

	Hey there. We didn't {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Record307&diff=prev&oldid=697466 get rid of it}}; it's just temporarily broken due to a known issue with the software. It will be fixed the next time we upgrade. Cheers. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)		Hey there. We didn't {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Record307&diff=prev&oldid=697466 get rid of it}}; it's just temporarily broken due to a known issue with the software. It will be fixed the next time we upgrade. Cheers. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
-	:Oh, thanks for the information DC.	+	:Oh, thanks for the information DC.{{User:Record307/sig}} 02:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Record307: /* Bottom 10 */

2010-04-02T02:44:17Z

Bottom 10

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 2 April 2010
Line 74:		Line 74:

	Hey there. We didn't {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Record307&diff=prev&oldid=697466 get rid of it}}; it's just temporarily broken due to a known issue with the software. It will be fixed the next time we upgrade. Cheers. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)		Hey there. We didn't {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Record307&diff=prev&oldid=697466 get rid of it}}; it's just temporarily broken due to a known issue with the software. It will be fixed the next time we upgrade. Cheers. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Oh, thanks for the information DC.

It's dot com: /**/Bottom 10

2010-04-02T02:43:01Z

: Bottom 10

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 2 April 2010
Line 70:		Line 70:
	: On that note, I apologize for my sarcastic reprise of the same. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		: On that note, I apologize for my sarcastic reprise of the same. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
	::I accept your apology Jay. I also will make more sense in my summaries.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 01:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		::I accept your apology Jay. I also will make more sense in my summaries.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 01:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Bottom 10 ==
		+
		+	Hey there. We didn't {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Record307&diff=prev&oldid=697466 get rid of it}}; it's just temporarily broken due to a known issue with the software. It will be fixed the next time we upgrade. Cheers. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Record307: /* Edit summaries */ sorry juys

2010-02-24T01:34:31Z

Edit summaries: sorry juys

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 24 February 2010
Line 69:		Line 69:
	Hello, Record307. Wanted to mention to you that whenever you make an edit summary, you should be sure it makes sense not only on Recent Changes, but also in the page's history. For example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=isp&curid=24029&diff=694944&oldid=694942&rcid=655511 this edit summary] refers to the edit summary below it on RC, which means it won't make sense in the page history. Edit summaries last as long as the wiki does in page histories, while they disappear from RC in a few days, so it's much more important for summaries to make sense in pages histories. Thanks, talk atcha later. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		Hello, Record307. Wanted to mention to you that whenever you make an edit summary, you should be sure it makes sense not only on Recent Changes, but also in the page's history. For example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=isp&curid=24029&diff=694944&oldid=694942&rcid=655511 this edit summary] refers to the edit summary below it on RC, which means it won't make sense in the page history. Edit summaries last as long as the wiki does in page histories, while they disappear from RC in a few days, so it's much more important for summaries to make sense in pages histories. Thanks, talk atcha later. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
	: On that note, I apologize for my sarcastic reprise of the same. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		: On that note, I apologize for my sarcastic reprise of the same. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	::I accept your apology Jay. I also will make more sense in my summaries.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 01:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Jay: /* Edit summaries */

2010-02-23T01:54:14Z

Edit summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 23 February 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:

	Hello, Record307. Wanted to mention to you that whenever you make an edit summary, you should be sure it makes sense not only on Recent Changes, but also in the page's history. For example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=isp&curid=24029&diff=694944&oldid=694942&rcid=655511 this edit summary] refers to the edit summary below it on RC, which means it won't make sense in the page history. Edit summaries last as long as the wiki does in page histories, while they disappear from RC in a few days, so it's much more important for summaries to make sense in pages histories. Thanks, talk atcha later. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		Hello, Record307. Wanted to mention to you that whenever you make an edit summary, you should be sure it makes sense not only on Recent Changes, but also in the page's history. For example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=isp&curid=24029&diff=694944&oldid=694942&rcid=655511 this edit summary] refers to the edit summary below it on RC, which means it won't make sense in the page history. Edit summaries last as long as the wiki does in page histories, while they disappear from RC in a few days, so it's much more important for summaries to make sense in pages histories. Thanks, talk atcha later. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	: On that note, I apologize for my sarcastic reprise of the same. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /**/Edit summaries

2010-02-23T01:49:50Z

: Edit summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 23 February 2010
Line 64:		Line 64:
	:Sorry. I had just woken up and I couldn't think of anything else to say. Thanks for the ideas though.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 17:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)		:Sorry. I had just woken up and I couldn't think of anything else to say. Thanks for the ideas though.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 17:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
	:: I thought my welcome was fine! you did a GOOD job, Record. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)		:: I thought my welcome was fine! you did a GOOD job, Record. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Edit summaries ==
		+
		+	Hello, Record307. Wanted to mention to you that whenever you make an edit summary, you should be sure it makes sense not only on Recent Changes, but also in the page's history. For example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=isp&curid=24029&diff=694944&oldid=694942&rcid=655511 this edit summary] refers to the edit summary below it on RC, which means it won't make sense in the page history. Edit summaries last as long as the wiki does in page histories, while they disappear from RC in a few days, so it's much more important for summaries to make sense in pages histories. Thanks, talk atcha later. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Jibblejibblejibble: /* Welcoming */

2010-01-04T02:06:35Z

Welcoming

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 4 January 2010
Line 63:		Line 63:
	Hey, Record. Just wanted to mention something about [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJibblejibblejibble&diff=688428&oldid=688423 this welcome]: While it was nicely written, it wasn't personal. You could copy that welcome to any new user, and it would work equally well. We really want to always make welcomes personal, based on a user's edits or something on their userpage or something. Just something to work on for next time. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)		Hey, Record. Just wanted to mention something about [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJibblejibblejibble&diff=688428&oldid=688423 this welcome]: While it was nicely written, it wasn't personal. You could copy that welcome to any new user, and it would work equally well. We really want to always make welcomes personal, based on a user's edits or something on their userpage or something. Just something to work on for next time. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
	:Sorry. I had just woken up and I couldn't think of anything else to say. Thanks for the ideas though.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 17:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)		:Sorry. I had just woken up and I couldn't think of anything else to say. Thanks for the ideas though.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 17:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
		+	:: I thought my welcome was fine! you did a GOOD job, Record. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Record307: /* Welcoming */ reply

2009-12-05T17:03:01Z

Welcoming: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 5 December 2009
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Hey, Record. Just wanted to mention something about [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJibblejibblejibble&diff=688428&oldid=688423 this welcome]: While it was nicely written, it wasn't personal. You could copy that welcome to any new user, and it would work equally well. We really want to always make welcomes personal, based on a user's edits or something on their userpage or something. Just something to work on for next time. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)		Hey, Record. Just wanted to mention something about [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJibblejibblejibble&diff=688428&oldid=688423 this welcome]: While it was nicely written, it wasn't personal. You could copy that welcome to any new user, and it would work equally well. We really want to always make welcomes personal, based on a user's edits or something on their userpage or something. Just something to work on for next time. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
		+	:Sorry. I had just woken up and I couldn't think of anything else to say. Thanks for the ideas though.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 17:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /**/Welcoming

2009-12-05T14:29:54Z

: Welcoming

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 5 December 2009
Line 58:		Line 58:
	:How's this? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 11:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)		:How's this? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 11:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
	::ooo, Thank's a lot man! I appreciate it!--{{User:Record307/sig}} 12:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)		::ooo, Thank's a lot man! I appreciate it!--{{User:Record307/sig}} 12:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Welcoming ==
		+
		+	Hey, Record. Just wanted to mention something about [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJibblejibblejibble&diff=688428&oldid=688423 this welcome]: While it was nicely written, it wasn't personal. You could copy that welcome to any new user, and it would work equally well. We really want to always make welcomes personal, based on a user's edits or something on their userpage or something. Just something to work on for next time. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Record307: /* Decemberween Sig */ Whoah Thanx

2009-12-02T12:36:55Z

Decemberween Sig: Whoah Thanx

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:36, 2 December 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:
	[[Image:Record307sig.png\|34px]]'''[[User:Record307\|<span style="color:#00FF00;">R</span><span style="color:#12EC00;">e</span><span style="color:#1EDF00;">c</span><span style="color:#2BD300;">o</span><span style="color:#37C700;">r</span><span style="color:#43BB00;">d</span><span style="color:#4FAF00;">3</span><span style="color:#5BA300;">0</span><span style="color:#679700;">7</span>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Record307\|<span style="color:#738B00;">T</span><span style="color:#7F7F00;">a</span><span style="color:#8C7200;">l</span><span style="color:#986700;">k</span>]]</sup></small>/<small><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Record307\|<span style="color:#A45A00;">C</span><span style="color:#B04E00;">o</span><span style="color:#BC4200;">n</span><span style="color:#C83600;">t</span><span style="color:#D42A00;">r</span><span style="color:#E01E00;">i</span><span style="color:#EC1200;">b</span><span style="color:#FF0000;">s</span>]]</sub></small>'''		[[Image:Record307sig.png\|34px]]'''[[User:Record307\|<span style="color:#00FF00;">R</span><span style="color:#12EC00;">e</span><span style="color:#1EDF00;">c</span><span style="color:#2BD300;">o</span><span style="color:#37C700;">r</span><span style="color:#43BB00;">d</span><span style="color:#4FAF00;">3</span><span style="color:#5BA300;">0</span><span style="color:#679700;">7</span>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Record307\|<span style="color:#738B00;">T</span><span style="color:#7F7F00;">a</span><span style="color:#8C7200;">l</span><span style="color:#986700;">k</span>]]</sup></small>/<small><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Record307\|<span style="color:#A45A00;">C</span><span style="color:#B04E00;">o</span><span style="color:#BC4200;">n</span><span style="color:#C83600;">t</span><span style="color:#D42A00;">r</span><span style="color:#E01E00;">i</span><span style="color:#EC1200;">b</span><span style="color:#FF0000;">s</span>]]</sub></small>'''
	:How's this? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 11:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)		:How's this? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 11:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
		+	::ooo, Thank's a lot man! I appreciate it!--{{User:Record307/sig}} 12:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)