Talk:web comics - Revision history

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* podstar new paper */ yes

2023-03-01T05:44:59Z

podstar new paper: yes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 1 March 2023
Line 359:		Line 359:
	:"The end", I assume. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)		:"The end", I assume. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
	::Hm. But that doesn't really make sense in the context of the scene though. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}		::Hm. But that doesn't really make sense in the context of the scene though. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
		+	:::Yeah, that's what this fun fact is pointing out. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 05:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

2023-03-01T01:32:49Z

podstar new paper: hmm

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 1 March 2023
Line 358:		Line 358:
	Does anyone know what the Podstar paper said? None of the Podstar 2008 files are downloadable anymore so I can't find out myself. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}		Does anyone know what the Podstar paper said? None of the Podstar 2008 files are downloadable anymore so I can't find out myself. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
	:"The end", I assume. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)		:"The end", I assume. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
		+	::Hm. But that doesn't really make sense in the context of the scene though. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}

2023-02-28T23:02:37Z

podstar new paper: I think this is what it usually says

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 28 February 2023
Line 357:		Line 357:
	<blockquote>[...] the Podstar Runner version of this toon had the text of the first New Paper altered in such a way as to deprive it of any relevance to Strong Bad's criticism of comics that use fan-submitted material</blockquote>		<blockquote>[...] the Podstar Runner version of this toon had the text of the first New Paper altered in such a way as to deprive it of any relevance to Strong Bad's criticism of comics that use fan-submitted material</blockquote>
	Does anyone know what the Podstar paper said? None of the Podstar 2008 files are downloadable anymore so I can't find out myself. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}		Does anyone know what the Podstar paper said? None of the Podstar 2008 files are downloadable anymore so I can't find out myself. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
		+	:"The end", I assume. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

2023-02-28T19:31:52Z

: podstar new paper

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 28 February 2023
Line 352:		Line 352:

	Find edges was not exactly right. It was find edges and invert. Reason? [[Special:Contributions/94.2.3.59\|94.2.3.59]] 17:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)		Find edges was not exactly right. It was find edges and invert. Reason? [[Special:Contributions/94.2.3.59\|94.2.3.59]] 17:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	== podstar new paper ==
		+
		+	<blockquote>[...] the Podstar Runner version of this toon had the text of the first New Paper altered in such a way as to deprive it of any relevance to Strong Bad's criticism of comics that use fan-submitted material</blockquote>
		+	Does anyone know what the Podstar paper said? None of the Podstar 2008 files are downloadable anymore so I can't find out myself. - {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}

2021-01-09T21:13:38Z

general clean-up of unsigned, etc

2021-01-09T17:02:52Z

: 2 effects

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 9 January 2021
Line 350:		Line 350:
	==[[Not X]] Reference?==		==[[Not X]] Reference?==
	Would any of you guys consider "non-punchline" a variation of Not X? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 02:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		Would any of you guys consider "non-punchline" a variation of Not X? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 02:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== 2 effects ==
		+
		+	Find edges was not exactly right. It was find edges and invert. Reason?

2009-08-30T02:38:25Z

Not X Reference?: Would any of you guys consider "non-punchline" a variation of Not X?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 30 August 2009
Line 347:		Line 347:

	Shouldn't it be pronounced "re-allying" instead of "really-ing?"		Shouldn't it be pronounced "re-allying" instead of "really-ing?"
		+
		+	==[[Not X]] Reference?==
		+	Would any of you guys consider "non-punchline" a variation of Not X? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 02:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

2009-02-22T16:31:50Z

: Pronunciation of "Reallying"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 22 February 2009
Line 343:		Line 343:

	I added a reference to Run-D.M.C.'s "You Be Illin'" in the Real World section. Not only is the phraseology practically identical to the action figure's description, but this song was what popularized the term in hip-hop culture during the late 80's. (I'm actually surprised no one has mentioned it before).		I added a reference to Run-D.M.C.'s "You Be Illin'" in the Real World section. Not only is the phraseology practically identical to the action figure's description, but this song was what popularized the term in hip-hop culture during the late 80's. (I'm actually surprised no one has mentioned it before).
		+
		+	== Pronunciation of "Reallying" ==
		+
		+	Shouldn't it be pronounced "re-allying" instead of "really-ing?"

2008-12-09T18:32:19Z

Bob and George?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 9 December 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:

	: i would like to point out that the speech baloons are exactly like the ones in Bob and George. it was the first thing i noticed more than anything.		: i would like to point out that the speech baloons are exactly like the ones in Bob and George. it was the first thing i noticed more than anything.
		+
		+	:I say that Bob and George would be a more appropriate reference, given the greater similarity between the pixel comic and B&G (and the similarities between Stinkoman and Mega Man).

	== Explanations ==		== Explanations ==

2008-12-06T18:16:36Z

Run-D.M.C

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 6 December 2008
Line 340:		Line 340:
	== Run-D.M.C ==		== Run-D.M.C ==

-	I added a reference to Run-D.M.C.'s "You Be Illin'" in the Real World section. Not only is the phraseology practically identical to the action figure's description, but this song was what popularized the term in hip-hop culture during the late 80's.	+	I added a reference to Run-D.M.C.'s "You Be Illin'" in the Real World section. Not only is the phraseology practically identical to the action figure's description, but this song was what popularized the term in hip-hop culture during the late 80's. (I'm actually surprised no one has mentioned it before).