Talk:Until Next Time... - Revision history

Defender1031: stray newline

2015-08-16T05:01:24Z

stray newline

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 16 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	== False positive ==		== False positive ==

Line 22:		Line 21:
	::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)		::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
	:::::::::: Definitely '''keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)		:::::::::: Definitely '''keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
-	~~::::::::::: Agree, I'll remove tbd since most agree keep. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 21:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)~~

Broncotroll at 21:26, 15 August 2015

2015-08-15T21:26:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-

	== False positive ==		== False positive ==
Line 23:		Line 22:
	::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)		::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
	:::::::::: Definitely '''keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)		:::::::::: Definitely '''keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::: Agree, I'll remove tbd since most agree keep. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 21:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Broncotroll at 21:25, 15 August 2015

2015-08-15T21:25:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{tobediscussed}}~~	+

	== False positive ==		== False positive ==

RickTommy: /* Needed? */

2011-05-05T00:20:01Z

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 5 May 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:
	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' [[User:Doctorwho295\|Doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010		::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' [[User:Doctorwho295\|Doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010
	::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)		::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::: Definitely '''keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Garythesnail at 21:50, 4 May 2011

2011-05-04T21:50:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 4 May 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' [[User:Doctorwho295\|Doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010		::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' [[User:Doctorwho295\|Doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010
		+	::::::::: I think this is basically just the [[Email_Outros]] article, albeit rewritten. '''BALEET, and merge.''' [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Defender1031: that is not a sig.

2010-06-15T20:33:39Z

that is not a sig.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 15 June 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
-	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' {{User:~~doctorwho295~~\|~~doctorwho295}}~~ 15 June 2010	+	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' [[User:Doctorwho295\|Doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010

Doctorwho295: /* Needed? */

2010-06-15T20:29:01Z

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 15 June 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
-	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.'''	+	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.''' {{User:doctorwho295\|doctorwho295}} 15 June 2010

Doctorwho295: /* Needed? */

2010-06-15T20:28:06Z

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 15 June 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::::::'''Keep.''' This page captured a running gag early on in HR's history. Really this running gag was the only fluid, real joke in the early days. If this page goes, I'm going with it. '''Keep.'''

Elcool: /* Needed? */ and now we have 4 cents. We can almost buy bubblegum!

2010-04-08T08:13:50Z

Needed?: and now we have 4 cents. We can almost buy bubblegum!

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 8 April 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:::::I tend to disagree. While the phrasing is different, the meaning of the joke is almost the same. See the similar structure I mentioned above. Both phrases are the kind you'd hear in a cheesy TV show and that's the intent of the joke. If we must separate them, then how about putting them under different headers? {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::I tend to disagree. While the phrasing is different, the meaning of the joke is almost the same. See the similar structure I mentioned above. Both phrases are the kind you'd hear in a cheesy TV show and that's the intent of the joke. If we must separate them, then how about putting them under different headers? {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Just for clarification: I like the page as it is now. I only suggested splitting into headers as a compromise, if it must come to that. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Needed? */ i'm here to make my 2 cents come true!

2010-04-07T17:45:13Z

Needed?: i'm here to make my 2 cents come true!

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 7 April 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	::::As I said in the thread above, I don't think the "join us next week"s are the same kind of joke as "until next time", and they should be removed. Each entry on this page should have either "until next time" or "until next week" (I'm undecided on "tune in next time/week"). — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 07:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		::::As I said in the thread above, I don't think the "join us next week"s are the same kind of joke as "until next time", and they should be removed. Each entry on this page should have either "until next time" or "until next week" (I'm undecided on "tune in next time/week"). — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 07:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	:::::I tend to disagree. While the phrasing is different, the meaning of the joke is almost the same. See the similar structure I mentioned above. Both phrases are the kind you'd hear in a cheesy TV show and that's the intent of the joke. If we must separate them, then how about putting them under different headers? {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::I tend to disagree. While the phrasing is different, the meaning of the joke is almost the same. See the similar structure I mentioned above. Both phrases are the kind you'd hear in a cheesy TV show and that's the intent of the joke. If we must separate them, then how about putting them under different headers? {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::::I agree with Elcool that they're all the same type of structure, but disagree with him that they should be put under separate headers for no good reason. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)