Talk:Spoons - Revision history

Essence of Ghost Water: /* I don't have wepon */

2010-03-26T00:20:26Z

I don't have wepon

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 26 March 2010
Line 97:		Line 97:
	Can I ask where spoons have been used as weapons? -Essence of Ghost Water		Can I ask where spoons have been used as weapons? -Essence of Ghost Water
	:Did you forget [[The Battle of Strong Badia]]? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)		:Did you forget [[The Battle of Strong Badia]]? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
		+	::Yes, I know The Battle of Strong Badia. But Homestar was just carrying it. He never used it as a weapon, and I'm pretty sure we never know if he intended to use it as a weapon. -Essence of Ghost Water

Defender1031: /* I don't have wepon */ reply

2010-03-26T00:16:20Z

I don't have wepon: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 26 March 2010
Line 96:		Line 96:
	==I don't have wepon==		==I don't have wepon==
	Can I ask where spoons have been used as weapons? -Essence of Ghost Water		Can I ask where spoons have been used as weapons? -Essence of Ghost Water
		+	:Did you forget [[The Battle of Strong Badia]]? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Essence of Ghost Water at 00:13, 26 March 2010

2010-03-26T00:13:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 26 March 2010
Line 92:		Line 92:
	:::::::::Ah, that is a good point. It would have been the same joke had he said "to walk the dog with a leash" in the same tone (assuming the cartoon before that point had involved a dog". Alright, pudding with a spoon ref is out. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::Ah, that is a good point. It would have been the same joke had he said "to walk the dog with a leash" in the same tone (assuming the cartoon before that point had involved a dog". Alright, pudding with a spoon ref is out. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::I dunno, I think it should go in. Despite the fact that the joke would work with another item, the fact remains that the item named was a spoon. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.33\|132.183.138.33]] 18:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::I dunno, I think it should go in. Despite the fact that the joke would work with another item, the fact remains that the item named was a spoon. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.33\|132.183.138.33]] 18:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	==I don't have wepon==
		+	Can I ask where spoons have been used as weapons? -Essence of Ghost Water

132.183.138.33: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */

2009-11-05T18:39:16Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 5 November 2009
Line 91:		Line 91:
	::::::::I feel I should go back to my original point and the idea behind [[HRWiki:Spoons]]: the ''spoon itself'' is not used in any strange, weird, or unusual way. The fact that it comes out of [[hammerspace]] (or perhaps stinkoman's pocket) is a peculiarity of hammerspace itself, not of the spoon. Similarly, the way that Stinkoman delivers his line is not something strange about the spoon or the way it is used, but rather an artifact of the joke itself. As such, the joke explanation (if it needs to be explained at all -- and if you do find it that unusual) belongs in [[Under Construction]] and not in this article. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		::::::::I feel I should go back to my original point and the idea behind [[HRWiki:Spoons]]: the ''spoon itself'' is not used in any strange, weird, or unusual way. The fact that it comes out of [[hammerspace]] (or perhaps stinkoman's pocket) is a peculiarity of hammerspace itself, not of the spoon. Similarly, the way that Stinkoman delivers his line is not something strange about the spoon or the way it is used, but rather an artifact of the joke itself. As such, the joke explanation (if it needs to be explained at all -- and if you do find it that unusual) belongs in [[Under Construction]] and not in this article. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::::Ah, that is a good point. It would have been the same joke had he said "to walk the dog with a leash" in the same tone (assuming the cartoon before that point had involved a dog". Alright, pudding with a spoon ref is out. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::Ah, that is a good point. It would have been the same joke had he said "to walk the dog with a leash" in the same tone (assuming the cartoon before that point had involved a dog". Alright, pudding with a spoon ref is out. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::I dunno, I think it should go in. Despite the fact that the joke would work with another item, the fact remains that the item named was a spoon. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.33\|132.183.138.33]] 18:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */ i concede

2009-11-02T00:53:32Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!: i concede

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 2 November 2009
Line 90:		Line 90:
	:::::::But he doesn't say "let's get a spoon and take a break to eat pudding" he says "we deserve a break to eat pudding with a spoon". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::::But he doesn't say "let's get a spoon and take a break to eat pudding" he says "we deserve a break to eat pudding with a spoon". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::I feel I should go back to my original point and the idea behind [[HRWiki:Spoons]]: the ''spoon itself'' is not used in any strange, weird, or unusual way. The fact that it comes out of [[hammerspace]] (or perhaps stinkoman's pocket) is a peculiarity of hammerspace itself, not of the spoon. Similarly, the way that Stinkoman delivers his line is not something strange about the spoon or the way it is used, but rather an artifact of the joke itself. As such, the joke explanation (if it needs to be explained at all -- and if you do find it that unusual) belongs in [[Under Construction]] and not in this article. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		::::::::I feel I should go back to my original point and the idea behind [[HRWiki:Spoons]]: the ''spoon itself'' is not used in any strange, weird, or unusual way. The fact that it comes out of [[hammerspace]] (or perhaps stinkoman's pocket) is a peculiarity of hammerspace itself, not of the spoon. Similarly, the way that Stinkoman delivers his line is not something strange about the spoon or the way it is used, but rather an artifact of the joke itself. As such, the joke explanation (if it needs to be explained at all -- and if you do find it that unusual) belongs in [[Under Construction]] and not in this article. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::Ah, that is a good point. It would have been the same joke had he said "to walk the dog with a leash" in the same tone (assuming the cartoon before that point had involved a dog". Alright, pudding with a spoon ref is out. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Stux: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */ going back to my original point

2009-11-02T00:51:03Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!: going back to my original point

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 2 November 2009
Line 89:		Line 89:
	:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::But he doesn't say "let's get a spoon and take a break to eat pudding" he says "we deserve a break to eat pudding with a spoon". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::::But he doesn't say "let's get a spoon and take a break to eat pudding" he says "we deserve a break to eat pudding with a spoon". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::I feel I should go back to my original point and the idea behind [[HRWiki:Spoons]]: the ''spoon itself'' is not used in any strange, weird, or unusual way. The fact that it comes out of [[hammerspace]] (or perhaps stinkoman's pocket) is a peculiarity of hammerspace itself, not of the spoon. Similarly, the way that Stinkoman delivers his line is not something strange about the spoon or the way it is used, but rather an artifact of the joke itself. As such, the joke explanation (if it needs to be explained at all -- and if you do find it that unusual) belongs in [[Under Construction]] and not in this article. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */ reply

2009-11-02T00:45:12Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 2 November 2009
Line 88:		Line 88:
	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with a leash" but I would say something like "I'm going to get the leash" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with a leash" but I would say something like "I'm going to get the leash" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::But he doesn't say "let's get a spoon and take a break to eat pudding" he says "we deserve a break to eat pudding with a spoon". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Stux: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */ meh, update the reply with the new example...

2009-11-02T00:42:12Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!: meh, update the reply with the new example...

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 2 November 2009
Line 86:		Line 86:
	:::I actually agree that it's unusual. If i say something like "i'm taking a break to go walk my dog" do I usually add "with a leash" to the end of it? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::I actually agree that it's unusual. If i say something like "i'm taking a break to go walk my dog" do I usually add "with a leash" to the end of it? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
-	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with ~~my shoes~~" but I would say something like "I'm going to ~~put on my shoes~~" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)	+	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with a leash" but I would say something like "I'm going to get the leash" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Jellote: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */

2009-11-02T00:34:52Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 2 November 2009
Line 87:		Line 87:
	:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with my shoes" but I would say something like "I'm going to put on my shoes" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with my shoes" but I would say something like "I'm going to put on my shoes" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Stux: /* Eating pudding with a notable reference! */ reply for Defender (after edit conflict)

2009-11-02T00:32:43Z

Eating pudding with a notable reference!: reply for Defender (after edit conflict)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 2 November 2009
Line 86:		Line 86:
	:::I actually agree that it's unusual. If i say something like "i'm taking a break to go walk my dog" do I usually add "with a leash" to the end of it? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::I actually agree that it's unusual. If i say something like "i'm taking a break to go walk my dog" do I usually add "with a leash" to the end of it? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with my shoes" but I would say something like "I'm going to put on my shoes" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 2 November 2009
Line 87:		Line 87:
	:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::: Actually, DeFender brings up a good point. I switch back to my '''keep''' idea. Stux was very convincing, but DeFender out-convincing'd him.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with my shoes" but I would say something like "I'm going to put on my shoes" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)		:::::'''Defender''': True, i may not say "with my shoes" but I would say something like "I'm going to put on my shoes" (in this case to indicate that the speaker isn't wearing shoes). Stinkoman's interjection still doesn't seem like that unusual of a phrase construction. Indicating what utensil I'm going to eat some food with isn't that out of the ordinary. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::: I doubt you can honestly say "Mom, can I eat this pudding with a spoon" without trying to say something hilarious.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)