Talk:Iron Maiden - Revision history

Elcool: replate template

2010-04-21T22:11:43Z

replate template

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 21 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk\|merge=Popular Music References}}
	==Fold back in?==		==Fold back in?==
	Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)		Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

StarFox: /* Fold back in? */

2010-03-31T18:33:34Z

Fold back in?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 31 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)		:I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
	:I agree with StarFox,it rarely has any appearances and is not what you would call a running gag.I'll add a picture to at least make it look nice.{{User:Wasd98/sig}} 15:08 30 November, 2009 (UTC)		:I agree with StarFox,it rarely has any appearances and is not what you would call a running gag.I'll add a picture to at least make it look nice.{{User:Wasd98/sig}} 15:08 30 November, 2009 (UTC)
		+	::For the record, I created the article. Since two of the facts will be merged, you can put the artist back. My standard for separate pages is 4+ references. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 18:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Rondleman: /* Fold back in? */

2009-11-30T20:09:26Z

Fold back in?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 30 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)		Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	:I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)		:I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I agree with StarFox,it rarely has any appearances and is not what you would call a running gag.I'll add a picture to at least make it look nice.{{User:Wasd98/sig}} 15:08 30 November, 2009 (UTC)

StarFox: /* Fold back in? */

2009-11-18T04:01:05Z

Fold back in?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 18 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Fold back in?==		==Fold back in?==
	Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)		Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Wbwolf: Merge?

2009-11-10T06:10:45Z

Merge?

New page

{{ttbd}}
==Fold back in?==
Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)