Talk:I'ma - Revision history

DorianGray: Switch template to {{deletedtalk}}

2008-05-19T01:34:54Z

Switch template to {{deletedtalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 19 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}

	Although you don't see this word as much as "gonna" in real life, it is still very common. TBC certainly didn't make it up, and in fact I myself use it. It's not even close to as weird as "be's"; it does not need a page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)		Although you don't see this word as much as "gonna" in real life, it is still very common. TBC certainly didn't make it up, and in fact I myself use it. It's not even close to as weird as "be's"; it does not need a page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Lapper: /* Deletion */ reply

2007-01-25T06:05:44Z

Deletion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 25 January 2007
Line 37:		Line 37:

	i don't think it should be deleted. it's something that shows up alot in homestarrunner.com, so why should it be deleted?--[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)		i don't think it should be deleted. it's something that shows up alot in homestarrunner.com, so why should it be deleted?--[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Not all words said on HR deserve articles; it's not really encyclopedic. This is why we're in the process of drafting a new deletion policy to accomodate articles that simply shouldn't be made. It looks like we've got a near-unanimous vote for deletion here, but we can give it a bit longer if you have another point to make. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 06:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Jangles5150 at 21:25, 24 January 2007

2007-01-24T21:25:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 24 January 2007
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	::::I think it shoud be [[DELETED!]]. {{unsigned\|141.149.83.168\|03:35, 15 January 2007}}		::::I think it shoud be [[DELETED!]]. {{unsigned\|141.149.83.168\|03:35, 15 January 2007}}
		+
		+	i don't think it should be deleted. it's something that shows up alot in homestarrunner.com, so why should it be deleted?--[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: moved to correct section and +unsigned

2007-01-15T03:37:46Z

moved to correct section and +unsigned

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 15 January 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
-		+	::::I think it shoud be [[DELETED!]]. {{unsigned\|141.149.83.168\|03:35, 15 January 2007}}
-	~~== DELETED!!! ==~~	+
-		+
-	I think it shoud be [[DELETED!]].	+

141.149.83.168: /* Deletion */

2007-01-15T03:35:58Z

Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 15 January 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== DELETED!!! ==
		+
		+	I think it shoud be [[DELETED!]].

Qermaq: /* Deletion */ are you full of hydrogen or helium?

2007-01-15T02:25:56Z

Deletion: are you full of hydrogen or helium?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 15 January 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:
	:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::Agreed. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

4kai2lyn6: /* Deletion */ I'm much too long-winded, (and presumably full of hot air)

2007-01-15T02:19:07Z

Deletion: I'm much too long-winded, (and presumably full of hot air)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 15 January 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:

	:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	::I think it was deleted just because it's too common in "everyday life", whatever that implies. It's just phonetically easier/faster to say "I'ma" than "I'm going to". This case is the opposite of "[[be's]]", which is actually phonetically harder than the standard "be", (which is why it's harder to come across in "everday life"), making [[be's]] an acceptable inside joke, (just in case you were wondering why we kept that page but want to delete this one). Sorry if that didn't really answer your question.... I guess I mostly posted this here to confirm this assumption for myself, (any takers concerning my theory?).... All in all, good try, Bobo! but I think this page should be deleted again. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 02:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Deletion */ reply

2007-01-15T02:04:26Z

Deletion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 15 January 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	::Hey, no need to be sorry for putting some work into the wiki ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		::Hey, no need to be sorry for putting some work into the wiki ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	::We want this sort of thing to happen. Just because a page was deleted once does not necessarily mean it is never going to be a page. It's great to revisit these from time to time, if only to be sure the consensus at that time is still the consensus of now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

	:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Shwoo: /* Deletion */ comment

2007-01-15T01:54:59Z

Deletion: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 15 January 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
	::Hey, no need to be sorry for putting some work into the wiki ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		::Hey, no need to be sorry for putting some work into the wiki ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I don't understand the reason this was deleted before. Just because The Brothers Chaps didn't make up the phrase, doesn't mean it's not a running gag. They didn't make up the words "crap" or "seriously" either. Is there a better reason that I missed? (Is dead from edit conflicts) {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: /* Deletion */ reply

2007-01-15T01:54:08Z

Deletion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 15 January 2007
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:Sorry! I saw it wasn't an article and figured it had never been made. Then the talk page came back and I tagged it for deletion. Ah well...		:Sorry! I saw it wasn't an article and figured it had never been made. Then the talk page came back and I tagged it for deletion. Ah well...
	:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)		:Speaking of, is there any way to make sure this doesn't happen again? Is there a category of deleted pages or something?--[[User:Bobo the King\|Bobo the King]] 01:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Hey, no need to be sorry for putting some work into the wiki ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)