HRWiki talk:IRC channel - Revision history

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* invalid? */ hopefully this helps

2022-10-02T22:03:15Z

invalid?: hopefully this helps

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 2 October 2022
Line 335:		Line 335:
	Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)		Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
	Can someone please tell me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)		Can someone please tell me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
		+	:The link on the right should work (it does for me, at least). As for the links on the left, those will only work if you have an [[HRWiki:IRC channel#IRC clients\|IRC client]], as explained on the page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

TMBGLOVER: /* invalid? */

2022-10-02T20:23:14Z

invalid?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 2 October 2022
Line 334:		Line 334:

	Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)		Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
		+	Can someone please tell me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

TMBGLOVER at 18:52, 26 September 2022

2022-09-26T18:52:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 26 September 2022
Line 330:		Line 330:
	I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
	:Works for me. You might check that your Java plugin is up-to-date and that you haven't blocked the chat applet in your security settings. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		:Works for me. You might check that your Java plugin is up-to-date and that you haven't blocked the chat applet in your security settings. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== invalid? ==
		+
		+	Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

It's dot com: fix

2016-01-23T01:32:12Z

fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 23 January 2016
Line 329:		Line 329:

	I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
-	:Works for me. You might check that your Java plugin is up to date and that you haven't blocked the chat applet in your security settings. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)	+	:Works for me. You might check that your Java plugin is up-to-date and that you haven't blocked the chat applet in your security settings. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* It doesn't work. */ works for me

2016-01-23T01:30:41Z

It doesn't work.: works for me

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 23 January 2016
Line 329:		Line 329:

	I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
		+	:Works for me. You might check that your Java plugin is up to date and that you haven't blocked the chat applet in your security settings. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /**/It doesn't work.

2016-01-23T01:10:24Z

: It doesn't work.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 23 January 2016
Line 325:		Line 325:
	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)		:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
	::::That's... amazing info? Anyway you should be happy to note that it is now possible (and has been for a while) to change nicks while in that channel. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 04:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)		::::That's... amazing info? Anyway you should be happy to note that it is now possible (and has been for a while) to change nicks while in that channel. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 04:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== It doesn't work. ==
		+
		+	I click on chat.hrwiki.org, I log in, and then go to a blank page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* MODE #hrwiki-rc -n? */ that's... amazing?

2011-08-02T04:33:16Z

MODE #hrwiki-rc -n?: that's... amazing?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 2 August 2011
Line 324:		Line 324:
	:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)		:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)		:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::That's... amazing info? Anyway you should be happy to note that it is now possible (and has been for a while) to change nicks while in that channel. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 04:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: /* MODE #hrwiki-rc -n? */ Or not.

2011-08-02T03:54:26Z

MODE #hrwiki-rc -n?: Or not.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 2 August 2011
Line 323:		Line 323:
	:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)		:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
	:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)		:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
-	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited ~~{{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}}~~ 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)	+	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: /* MODE #hrwiki-rc -n? */ I know how have a raw IRC session, to. Last edit.

2011-08-02T03:53:48Z

MODE #hrwiki-rc -n?: I know how have a raw IRC session, to. Last edit.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:53, 2 August 2011
Line 323:		Line 323:
	:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)		:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
	:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)		:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
-	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), edited 03:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)	+	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. Oh, and "MODE #hrwiki-rc -n" is the correct raw command. Using a colon gets it misinterpreted: MODE #hrwiki-rc :+v HRWiki-RC would treat every character as a mode character, even the space. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), last edited {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: /* MODE #hrwiki-rc -n? */ Minor notes.

2011-08-02T03:44:22Z

MODE #hrwiki-rc -n?: Minor notes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 2 August 2011
Line 323:		Line 323:
	:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)		:I agree that it's annoying. (I'm assuming you mean -m, not -n.) There really should be a mode that prevents talking but still allows nick changes. Still, we prefer the mode be set the way it is so that we don't have to worry about moderating the channel. My advice is not to idle in the channel and join it only when you're at your computer. All of the information the channel provides is readily available using [[Special:RecentChanges]], so you won't be missing anything. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
	:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)		:: I hadn't looked at freenode's list of channel modes, I assumed that the +n stood for no nick changes as it does for another network I know of. While I will follow your advice, why not instead do a quiet ban on everyone, with HRWikiRC being one of the only few exceptions (the others being ops)? {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
-	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)	+	:::I noticed my mistake earlier, but now I can't help but correct myself so that I don't look like a novice IRC user. +n is a channel mode that denies messages/notices from clients that are not in the channel. This is defined in [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 RFC1459], which was the first IRC standard. Channel and user mode characters defined in this Request For Comment should never be repurposed or removed, or else you're looking at a stupidly-designed IRC daemon that's going to break a lot of compatibility with clients and bots, which is what freenode's old IRCd did to at least +m. What I was referring to was an extended ban. Extended bans add more functionality to the +b nick!user@host mode by adding different syntaxes and types of bans to the +b channel mode, which don't break any guidelines in RFC1459 at all. When I said +n in my original post, I was referring to the "n" extended ban that's found in (at least) UnrealIRCd3.2, which disallows a user to change nicknames while on the affected channel. This is done by setting +b ~n:nick!user@host. freenode's current IRCd, which is based on Charybdis, now supports extended bans with a similar syntax, but doesn't support a nick change extended ban. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC), edited 03:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 2 October 2022
Line 335:		Line 335:
	Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)		Whenever I click on any of the links, it says, “this address is invalid.” Can someone help me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
	Can someone please tell me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)		Can someone please tell me? [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
		+	:The link on the right should work (it does for me, at least). As for the links on the left, those will only work if you have an [[HRWiki:IRC channel#IRC clients\|IRC client]], as explained on the page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)