Kittie Rose wrote:
"[...] homosexual activist agenda [...]"
Man, I can't stand that phrase. I think it's one of the very few phrases in the English language that sounds like nails on chalkboard when I hear it.
I mean, do people honestly think that people with a certain sexual preference are deliberately conspiring to destroy "family values" (that's another chalkboard phrase)? Well, I guess that's a silly question, considering that some people have said so explicitly. Geez. It's like they think that gay people just want to be gay at them. Or to put it another way, they're taking it personally when it has nothing to do with them. (Kind of a self-centered point of view when put that way, isn't it?)
I remember I was listening to Bill Maher (I don't listen to political shows most of the time, although I do like Bill Maher; he just happened to be on TV when I was in the room), and his thoughts on the matter pretty much matched my own. He said that it's not about whether or not gay sex is morally wrong or not. It's just that most people experience revulsion of the idea of, um, two guys... in bed... y'know. Heck, not even I find it a pleasant thought and I'm bisexual. And he said he felt that way about it, too, that he thought it's
disgusting -- but at the same time he understands that it's not a good idea to write his
opinion into the
law. Amen to that!
But I digress. Ah, wait, this whole post has been a digression. I'm not good at staying on-topic today, apparently, but what else am I going to say? "lol barbie's not a trans"? Heh. Well, that's enough posts for today. G'night.
- Kef