^But you could send in your vote at any time during the night round.
So it doesn't matter really what day you're on, it's what round you post in.

That doesnt disprove anything or prove anything. You are agreeing that the evidence is strong against you and that I was right in you being inactive. How does that help you when you ask us to abstain or vote someone else off?

If you have some other evidence that shows you are not the SK Id gladly consider it as in no way has my vote been set in stone.

Also, as the SK, Susan would be able to note who's floating, when those floaters actually vote, and time their kills to set a floater up in this way.

sk is worse in the long run noid, as there is only one of him/her/it.

There's little evidence for Biscuit. Remember in the last game, when we all thought STu was a villain because he told us in his PM he was a human? I'm convinced that this is the same deal with Biscuit.

The sk is just as clueless as us as to who are wolves right now.

He's been nothing short of suspicious since this game started. Just go back and read his posts. They're not even rational half the time.

And the serial killer is obviously inactive...maybe take a look at inactive users?

We really gotta look for evidence, guys - 3 rounds in and we're getting the crap kicked out of us. We can't let this be the first wolf win.

I'll admit Biscuit is suspicious, but I feel like using the same old argument over and over again, so so was STu, in the last game and he turned out to be a human. He just was starting his TWG career and didn't know the right...maneuvers.

I'll admit Biscuit is suspicious, but I feel like using the same old argument over and over again, so so was STu, in the last game and he turned out to be a human. He just was starting his TWG career and didn't know the right...maneuvers.

I agree, I'm not saying Biscuit is definitely a wolf. But, apart from trying to find the SK, a task I agree is not in our best interest right now, who else do we have to vote for? Can you name anyone else who is more suspicious than Biscuit? Sure, the amount of suspicion we have for him in no way makes this a sure thin, but at least we have something for him. Each person can abstain all they want, but we, as a whole, need to lynch somebody, and I think that ought to be the person with the highest chance of being a villian. Hence, Biscuithead.

Can you name anyone else who is more suspicious than Biscuit?

All of his votes seem to lead to humans

These two posts are what made me decide to go digging in the posts of the past for clues. You just happened to fit the bill Mike. Also, you say the SK might have set you up by choosing when to kill but that would be extremely hard. You see, night rounds happen before day rounds in this game so the SK would have had to have known ahead of time that you were not going to be active in the first day round to start setting you up in the first place by night killing the first night. Unless they can travel through time in real life to read the boards before anyone else I cant see this happening.

Unless the SK decides to kill and waits to see if the attention draws some inactive users out.

But, seriously, activity during the night and activity during the day isn't necessarily correlated.

I don't see why the SK killing would bring them out when the mutants killing doesn't.

You have not shown me any proof to lead me to believe I'm killing a townie as of yet. If you can give me even a fraction of a doubt Ill change my vote. Also, why does it matter that the killing of the SK is rarer then the mutants, its still just a killing and is no different from the other killings that have occurred.