Homestar Runner Wiki Forum
http://forum.hrwiki.org/

The Werewolf Game: The Last Stand. Thanks for playing!
http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=11599		 Page 26 of 32
Author:  Inverse Tiger [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:42 am ]
Post subject: 
K, so it wasn't Jello, so apparently for some reason Einoo's not a wolf either. So how about TCT or SFG? Anyone feel either of them have been suspicious? One of them is probably the absentee wolf.
Author:  Beardo [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:08 am ]
Post subject: 
Well that's stupid, I was sure Jello was a wolf.
Author:  Einoo T. Spork [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:15 am ]
Post subject: 
Toldja I was human, dude. ;)
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:01 am ]
Post subject: 
So, wait, who's still alive? Hands up people.
Author:  Einoo T. Spork [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:07 am ]
Post subject: 
I'm not dead yet!
Author:  Homeschool Winner [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:12 am ]
Post subject: 
Einoo T. Spork wrote:
I'm not dead yet!

I am more not deadier! NOT DEADIER THAN THOU!
Author:  Beardo [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:51 am ]
Post subject: 
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
So, wait, who's still alive? Hands up people.


Try the first post...
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:26 am ]
Post subject: 
Beardo wrote:
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
So, wait, who's still alive? Hands up people.


Try the first post...


Good work, men! (I feel smart now)
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:01 am ]
Post subject: 
Is anybody still alive that we have evidence against?
Author:  Beardo [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:35 am ]
Post subject: 
Well, there's Susan (the high pitched voice thing), TCT (bant or something), and maybe you.

Due to this lack of evidence and the deadline wuickly approaching, I'm going to vote for Susan.
Author:  Dark Grapefruit [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:26 am ]
Post subject: 
Homeschool Winner has been killed. he was a human.
It is now day. Everyone vote. Please.
7 humans and 3 wolves remain.
Author:  Einoo T. Spork [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:47 am ]
Post subject: 
I'm going to start voting again! I swear! Sorry! I know I should be more active, since I'm, you know, the frickin' MAYOR, but... Yanno.

Not now though I have no clue.


...



I'm the worst mayor ever. I'm sure DG made me very mature and responsible in this thing just for irony's sake.
Author:  weer5e [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:57 am ]
Post subject: 
ughhh, another human is killed, I thought he was one who would survive, well I guess I will vote for susan because we don't have many leads at all.
Author:  Beardo [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Beardo wrote:
Well, there's Susan (the high pitched voice thing), TCT (bant or something), and maybe you.

Due to this lack of evidence and the deadline wuickly approaching, I'm going to vote for Susan.


lol, I'm such an are-tard.

Anyways, ya, go Susan.
Author:  Homeschool Winner [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Aww, darn wolves. I thought I was gonna make it to the end.

And I don't even get a death story? What's up with that?
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think either Rogue Leader, possibly Susan, or TCT. I'm pretty he sure he's that wolf that didn't vote, like Inverse said, cause I know it's not me.

Although I don't want to say that, cause if TCT dies and he's not a wolf, I'll look like a wolf.

Hmmm.

Is there anyone else that wasn't around that week?

Or is it possible that a wolf just didn't vote for some kind of strategy reason?

Perhaps, that being, when there is no wolf vote, pointing to a human who had stated they wouldn't be there that week.

Which, once again, leads back to my suspicion of Inverse.
Author:  Beardo [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Ya, I'm kind of suspicious of Inverse too... Maybe it's that whole man eating animal thing he's got going on.
Author:  Ju Ju Master [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
Homeschool Winner wrote:
And I don't even get a death story? What's up with that?


DG's computer time is limited, so she's stopped making stories for the time being.

sci-fi greg wrote:
Is there anyone else that wasn't around that week?

Or is it possible that a wolf just didn't vote for some kind of strategy reason?


Remember, two people voting for different people will give the same outcome as three people voting for different people. It could be either number.
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
DG said somewhere that one wolf didn't vote.
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:48 pm ]
Post subject: 
And we've yet to really figure out who that is. Except... if we knew that exactly we wouldn't really be having this discussion, because we'd know who the three wolves were. Inasmuch, who's been acting wolfy lately?
Author:  Exhibit A [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
As far as I know, DG never said that one wolf didn't vote. What she said was:
Dark Grapefruit wrote:
Shoot, that'll teach me to use creative license. >.> More than one wolf voted, such that the vote ended in a tie. If only one had voted, his vote would have been killed.
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
And we've yet to really figure out who that is. Except... if we knew that exactly we wouldn't really be having this discussion, because we'd know who the three wolves were. Inasmuch, who's been acting wolfy lately?


Wait, who are the other two?
Author:  Inverse Tiger [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
No one knows. We just know there are three, and one didn't vote. All we have is that, and all we can do is ask "why didn't that wolf vote?"

Exhibit A wrote:
As far as I know, DG never said that one wolf didn't vote. What she said was:
Dark Grapefruit wrote:
Shoot, that'll teach me to use creative license. >.> More than one wolf voted, such that the vote ended in a tie. If only one had voted, his vote would have been killed.

But if all three had voted, it wouldn't have been a tie. So one wolf didn't vote.
Author:  Exhibit A [ Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:43 am ]
Post subject: 
Unless they all voted for different people... why are you assuming there couldn't be a three-way tie?
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:09 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think I'm gonna vote Inverse.
Author:  Inverse Tiger [ Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
Exhibit A wrote:
Unless they all voted for different people... why are you assuming there couldn't be a three-way tie?

Heh, at first I responded to this like "um.. what are you talking about, that's not possible; if they all voted for the same person, that person would be killed". But as soon as I posted I realized oh yeah, if all three vote for a different person... I think I was thinking of the voting as if it was happening between only two people instead of all the humans. If it was only two people (like political voting) you can't have a tie with three people unless an even number of people vote. So the idea that it could be a tie with three people voting completely slipped my mind.

So.. nevermind anything about people who weren't here. So all we have is flimsy story evidence, and I'll vote Susan.

EDIT: in fact, I was so caught up in that two-way-race preconception that I didn't even notice you said "unless they all voted for different people" until 10 minutes after posting this. *sigh* I need some caffeine or something.
Author:  Susan [ Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:26 am ]
Post subject: 
NOTE: The same computer troubles DG has had are also effecting me. The family computer crashed causing our parents to require DG's computer frequently limiting her time and almost completely negating my time. Im on much less because of it.

Anyways, on to voting. I don't see how such flimsy story evidence can be used to kill me, but if thats all you got go ahead, see where is gets you when I'm dead. No where.

As for my suspicions, Inverse has led us to kill humans one to many times for my books. So he is high on my list.

However, Ive never really been sure about Sci-fi, I mean, he just seemed a little shady from the start, what with his odd posting habits to his wild accusations.

And then theres Beardo, really I have no evidence towards him, I just think hes not to trustworthy.

But for my actual vote, I believe the strongest evidence I have goes to Inverse, so I vote him.
Author:  Inverse Tiger [ Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:04 am ]
Post subject: 
Susan wrote:
As for my suspicions, Inverse has led us to kill humans one to many times for my books. So he is high on my list.

Hehe, this is great. Ok, first I've only voted for one human so far who ended up killed that round: Ian. And I was the last one to jump on that boat, so "led us" is more than a stretch. I voted for Jello the first round, but only because there was no evidence for anyone yet and my randomizer told me to, and I didn't advocate that anyone else should vote the same; in fact I was the only one to do so. Once again "led us"...? Everyone else I've voted for has either been a wolf or is Rogue or Susan, who are still alive and the only people with some flimsy story evidence against them. And then there was that list of suspects I drew up a while back, and most of the people on that list ended up being wolves, Ian being the only mistake on the list so far.

Also remember, when I was really the only one getting out there and making bold guesses, that's when DG's story mentioned the wolves talking about whether they should go after "the one who's guessing right". I still maintain that's me, and though my guesses haven't been as good lately, you probably shouldn't execute a human for that :p
Author:  sci-fi greg [ Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:46 am ]
Post subject: 
Inverse, that's a good point. But, I remember you saying things like that earlier. Like "If I'm a wolf, I'm certainly not helping them" But that could really just be an amazing strategy. You act as the perfect human, until you are the last wolf left. Then no one will suspect you as you pick of the last few humans.

Quote:
However, Ive never really been sure about Sci-fi, I mean, he just seemed a little shady from the start, what with his odd posting habits to his wild accusations.


First of all, I have no idea what you mean by "shady." Second, wild accusations? Show me at least one example of a wild accusation, and I'll vote for myself. I never accused anybody who didn't have substantial evidence against them. Well, except for the very first day, when I voted for TCT, but I had no evidence to go on then.
Author:  Dndrhead [ Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'm not dead yet?

I should start reading the stories.
Page 26 of 32 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/