Homestar Runner Wiki Forum
http://forum.hrwiki.org/

Political Party
http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1840
Page 7 of 7

Author:  Stinko_sad [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:21 am ]
Post subject: 

Teehee ,That made me laugh but I think of it in a different perspective.

Author:  Badri3211 [ Thu May 11, 2006 12:58 am ]
Post subject: 

Republican

Author:  Marshmallow Roast [ Thu May 11, 2006 1:04 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm a Democrat.

I don't understand Republicans' way of thinking... But, whatever. If we were all Democrats, we'd all agree, and then stuff would be boring.

Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Thu May 11, 2006 1:13 am ]
Post subject: 

Marshmallow Roast wrote:
I don't understand Republicans' way of thinking... But, whatever. If we were all Democrats, we'd all agree, and then stuff would be boring.


Heh, I bet there's some Republicans that would argue that :p

Although the opposite would be true as well (all being Republicans, that is).

Author:  Jello B. [ Thu May 11, 2006 1:56 am ]
Post subject: 

Marshmallow Roast wrote:
I don't understand Republicans' way of thinking... But, whatever. If we were all Democrats, we'd all agree, and then stuff would be boring.

Pfft. Democrats are boring, anyway. I mean, John Kerry? *yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwn*

Author:  Didymus [ Thu May 11, 2006 2:58 am ]
Post subject: 

What about Bill Clinton? Say what you want about the man, but he wasn't boring!

Author:  sb_enail.com [ Thu May 11, 2006 5:19 am ]
Post subject: 

Didymus wrote:
What about Bill Clinton? Say what you want about the man, but he wasn't boring!


No, he certainly wasn't. I remember early on in the Bush administration, there were still news stories about Clinton, something about him falling on the sidewalk while getting the morning paper. At the time, there wasn't anything particularly scandalous or remarkable about Bush, so they just called him "stupid" and left him alone (which was pretty callous in my opinion, as you have to be at least somewhat intelligent in order to win an election). Then, after Iraq they started calling him "stupid" and "a terrorist" (which was even more callous, as he stayed in the White House while the military supposedly mowed down civilians like fish in a barrel). I think the media in general misses Clinton, as the whole scandal made great news and there were always editorials and interviews with pundits that pumped up ratings. The media seems desperate to latch onto anything about Bush that could make a great story, like the CIA leak, Abramoff, all that stuff. Because there's no news like bad news. It's easy to sell! People eat it up! Who cares about the thousands of instances where crimes are averted when someone pulls a gun when there are one or two stories where a youth accidentally shoots a friend? Then they can launch tirades against gun companies for peddling death dealing death guns of death! We can cover the lawsuit, where the jury completely ignores the fact that the gun company never pulled the trigger and focuses on the sadness of the family and decides to award them a big fat sack of money!

Gosh, I'm sick to death of the liberal media. Say what you will about Fox News, but at least it's a different perspective.

Author:  Gorilla Knight [ Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:22 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm a Republican. I'm a VERY conservative person.

Author:  Beyond the Grave [ Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:23 am ]
Post subject: 

Gorilla Knight wrote:
I'm a Republican. I'm a VERY conservative person.
Oh where oh where,
Have the moderates gone?
Oh where, oh where
can they be?

Author:  Simon Zeno [ Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:26 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm not a moderate, per se, but about as many strong liberal ideas as I do strong conservative ideas... so maybe I'm an overall moderate...

Author:  Lu Bu [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:55 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm republican...but I don't really know much besides what my parents tell me, and my parents are heavy conservatives.

Author:  Beyond the Grave [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:45 am ]
Post subject: 

Lu Bu wrote:
I'm republican...but I don't really know much besides what my parents tell me, and my parents are heavy conservatives.
Read the news paper, watch the evening news and you will have a better understanding of things.

Author:  Badri3211 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

We Republicans, always use Laissez-faire, meaning that we let poor people take care of themselves without government protection.

Author:  Duecex2 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

I dunno, I thought I was a Democrat, but the Polictical Compass Test said I was Libetarian...

Author:  Jenny [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

i took that test thing and i'm smack in the middle of the lower left corner. what does that mean?

i always considered myself.... um... taking sides with whoever was right. i don't vote based on party so much as who i agree with, but i find the people i agree with never make it to office :\

but i'm anti-celebrity-politicians... Jesse Ventura sucked. Sometimes I think he was better than our current governer though. at least my dad wasn't losing his job because of him... oh wait, that's the feds ><;

gahh, i hate politicians in general

Author:  StrongRad [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

Jenny wrote:
at least my dad wasn't losing his job because of him... oh wait, that's the feds ><;

How's that? Did your dad have a federal job that got cut?

Author:  Didymus [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Badri3211 wrote:
We Republicans, always use Laissez-faire, meaning that we let poor people take care of themselves without government protection.

Yes, and often without asking the necessary question pertaining to whether or not they CAN take care of themselves. I.e., "personal responsibility" often used as an excuse for greed.

Author:  AwPi [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

I usually side with whatever's party's views would help out the nation the most, but seeing as my dad is strongly conservitave*sp*, I've gotten a tendancy from him to go for the republicans.

Author:  Badri3211 [ Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Didymus wrote:
Badri3211 wrote:
We Republicans, always use Laissez-faire, meaning that we let poor people take care of themselves without government protection.

Yes, and often without asking the necessary question pertaining to whether or not they CAN take care of themselves. I.e., "personal responsibility" often used as an excuse for greed.


There is a debate going on whether or not poor people should defend themselves or not.

Author:  Occasional JD [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:03 am ]
Post subject: 

Well, in Australia, we have two major political parties. First, we have the liberal party, who are like your republican party. Then, we have the labour party, they're like your...republican party...

Page 7 of 7 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/